Archive for March, 2008

Help$$ Ayuda Radio Gratis en Chiapas! Project TUPA: Transmitters Uniting the Peoples of the Americas Needs Help Helping to Give Voice to the Voiceless

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

[UPDATE: Correction: The people needing help getting to the workshop are from Chiapas where last year transmitters were built under the guidance of Project TUPA]

Project TUPA: Transmitters Uniting the People’s of the Americas desperately needs to raise a minimum of $250-300 to help bring impoverished budding radio technicians in rural indigenous Oaxaca (and maybe Chiapas and elsewhere) to Mexico City for advanced training in maintaining 25 new radio stations and transmitters built there last spring. Their funding for the project in Mexico fell through and these people attending free workshops at the new Center for Free Radio in Mexico City on July 9th have no way to get there. Help fight poverty by helping to fight exploitation in Mexico. Give whatever you’ve got, and help give voice to the voiceless. Any amount will help. Tax deduction available by signing checks to Project Tupa/Global Exchange. Otherwise, just make it out to “Project TUPA”

Send $$ to:

Free Radio Berkeley
Project TUPA
1442A Walnut St.
Berkeley, CA 94709

You can help free the airwaves. And help feed the Truth.

Go to www.radiotupa.org for more information. And go to www.freeradio.org for information. And, you, too, can build your own dang radio station. Attend their Radio Camp end of June in Oakland. Go from 0 to 40 watts in four days. Be your own voice and help free the airwaves. They’re the pirates! Radio belongs to all, not just to those who are rich enough to afford one. No technical skills needed. Don’t want to build your own radio transmitter and antenna? Learn to build one (FUN!) and donate it to an impoverished indigenous community.

Free Radio Berkeley, headed by radio wizard, Stephen Dunifer, which helps fund the nonprofit Project TUPA “on a half a shoestring budget” recently suffered a loss in the theft of a 40 watt transmitter destined to be shipped to Oaxaca yesterday. Help build 25 more!

Join me this summer in Oakland - Let’s build an alternative to lies posing as news.

Gracias! Let me know if you do, and I’ll send you my award winning book, DRIVE: The First Quartet and a valuable 220 page, soon to be published, manuscript of love poems.

Love the world. Turn it on. Build your own dang transmitter!

Lorna Dee Cervantes

“Oh honey, you turn me on, I’m a radio” - Joni Mitchell

Adult Swim + Zune = Upfront presentation envy (and a seventh night of programming)

Thursday, March 27th, 2008

Generally speaking, I am not an envious person. Really. That probably sounds strange coming from a chick who is occasionally forced to hobnob with the rich and famous, often looking far shabbier than they do.
The thing is, I have the freedom to look shabby. They’re under a microscope. They cannot go to the store to pick up beer and cookies wearing jammie bottoms and fuzzy boots without fear of appearing in a tabloid under some headline about having a breakdown, whereas I just did that a few days ago. (Try it some time, and you will know freedom.)
When I am envious, it’s for a very good reason. For example, I am very envious of other big cities that have had cool Adult Swim-sponsored parties with slammin’ DJs, guys dressed like Master Shake running around and other silliness.
What does Seattle get? 1) A few of those Lite Brite Mooninites, which were yanked after Boston freaked the fug out over one spotted on a bridge; and 2) a recent live performance by the stars of “Tim & Eric Awesome Show, Great Job,” one the Swim’s new live action shows, both of which seriously suck naughty bits.
Today I have another reason to be green. Three hours ago in New York City, Turner Broadcasting and Adult Swim, a mature-themed animation block airing on Cartoon Network between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. six nights a week, hosted an upfront presentation party, where the Swim announced it will add a seventh night of programing beginning Friday, July 6, at 11 p.m.
Thank God. How many times have you come home tipsy on a Friday night and turned on Cartoon Network only to have your buzz murdered by “Ed, Edd n Eddy”? As if kids would be up that late watching cartoons. Give us a break!
Also announced was “Robot Chicken: Star Wars,” coming to us on June 17. A second season of “The Boondocks” is due in the fall.
Here’s where envy struck: I found out the 500 or so people attending, most of them advertising and industry peeps, each received a Zune (which retails for around $230 a pop) packed with episodes of the following:
“Tim & Eric Awesome Show, Great Job.” “Saul of the Mole Men.” ” “Assy McGee.” “Frisky Dingo.” “Harvey Birdman.” “Metalocalypse.” “Moral Orel.” “Robot Chicken.” “Squidbilillies.”
Three new series: “Superjail.” “Lucy, Daughter of the Devil.” “Fat Guy Stuck in the Internet.”
And…and! “The Venture Bros.” (also back in the fall with new eps! Yes!) and “Aqua Teen Hunger Force.”
So, Seattle doesn’t get a big fat Adult Swim hip-hop fest. We don’t even rate high enough for a rapping Meatwad. But they’ll take our technology and shower New York high-rollers with it!
How is that right? If you have suffered through more than one episode of “Saul of the Mole Men” shouldn’t you get a free Zune? Most of the people at that party can afford to buy their own Zunes; how many broke-ass U-Dub students who watch Adult Swim every night can say the same?
I’m sure some of these Zunes will show up on eBay, but shouldn’t we, the poor folk, reap the profits of doing that instead of PayPal-ing our hard-earned scratch to some guy who’s just selling the thing so he’ll have something around to use if he runs out of toilet paper?
I’m just saying.
In case you’re wondering, this is not a solicitation for a pity Zune, Adult Swim! Keep your consolation prizes! Make up for this snub by bringing some lovely Swim noise (headlined by Dangerdoom, maybe?) to Seattle, dammit.
The official Adult Swim press release follows.

Following are programming highlights for 2007:
New to Adult Swim:

CONSUMER PROTECTION NOMINEE JOINS LONG LINE OF FLAWED BUSH APPOINTEES

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

By William Fisher

The nomination of a long-time manufacturers’ lobbyist to head the nation’s consumer safety watchdog agency is not only igniting fierce opposition from public interest groups, but is sparking a reexamination of the Bush Administration’s five-year history of appointing senior officials many regard as “cronies” who were inefficient, inexperienced and, in some cases, forced to resign under pressure or convicted of crimes.

According to a report released by Public Citizen, Michael Baroody, President Bush’s nominee to chair the Consumer Products Safety Commission, was the top lobbyist for the country’s most powerful industry trade association when the group supported weakening guidelines for reporting information about dangerous products.

The report charged that the “requirements that the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and its allies sought to weaken had been responsible for more than 80 percent of the fines issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) over the past decade. NAM’s members and its coalition partners were responsible for paying more than half of those fines.”

The CPSC is tasked with protecting the public – and especially children – from serious injury or death and monitors more than 15,000 types of consumer products. Reports about product hazards are mandated by the Consumer Product Safety Act, one of the key laws governing the CPSC’s role in protecting consumer safety.

Public Citizen says that with Baroody serving as its executive director for lobbying efforts, NAM supported a move to weaken agency protocols that dictate when companies – including NAM members – must immediately report information about potentially hazardous product defects. The changes NAM successfully pressed for could affect the agency’s ability to issue timely decisions to recall dangerous products.

“As head of the CPSC, Baroody would be in charge of administering the weakened disclosure guidance his industry association sought, presenting a serious and unavoidable conflict of interest,” said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook. “Under his authority, consumer and public safety would be at risk, while the companies he represented for years would save millions in future fines.”

Public Citizen’s analysis shows that weakening the rules had enormous financial benefits for NAM and its manufacturer members at the expense of consumer safety. Alleged violations of reporting guidelines were responsible for about $32.9 million of $39.6 million in civil fines collected by the CPSC since 1997. NAM members and affiliates accounted for more than half of those payments, totaling $18 million. Five of those companies alone paid a combined $10 million for allegedly violating reporting guidelines.

“While Baroody was at its helm, NAM had a record of unrelenting hostility to the safety of consumers, including small children,” said Laura MacCleery, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “Baroody should not be confirmed to lead a safety agency that has such a vital role in protecting American families.”

The Baroody nomination has rekindled charges of serious ethics breaches, conflicts of interest, inefficiency, cronyism, and a number of criminal convictions among Bush political appointees since the election of 2000.

The public is by now familiar with the more high profile cases. The departure of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The conviction of Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter Libby, for lying to a federal grand jury in connection with the leaking of a CIA operative’s identity. The conviction of David Safavian, head of all government procurement at the Office of Management and Budget, for lying to ethics officials and Senate investigators about his ties to lobbyist Jack Abramoff. The resignation of neoconservative leader Richard Perle, one of the architects of the Iraq invasion, who stepped down as Chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board amid conflict-of-interest charges. The firing of Michael Brown, the FEMA director whose performance before, during and after Hurricane Katrina became a national scandal. And, most recently, the resignation of Monica Goodling, the Bush administration official believed to have played a pivotal role in the current contretemps over sacked prosecutors, after she invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to testify to Congress.

Less well-known to the public is the catalog of indictments or guilty pleas by lower-level Executive Branch political appointees. Here are some of them, originally compiled by Nick Turse of TPM Muckraker (www.tpmmuckraker.com), and added to by readers.

Steven Griles, Deputy Secretary at the Interior Department, who resigned and subsequently pled guilty to lying about his ties to convicted super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Dusty Foggo, CIA Executive Director, who was indicted following accusations of corruption in connection to the Duke Cunningham scandal.

Claude Allen, Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, who pled guilty to shoplifting from Target stores.

Larry Franklin, a DOD intelligence officer, who pled guilty to passing secrets to Israel.

Roger Stillwell, a desk officer at the Interior Department, who pled guilty to failing to report Redskins tickets and free dinners from Jack Abramoff.

Frank Figueroa, a senior official in the Department of Homeland Security, and former head of anti-sex-crime Operation Predator, who pled no contest to exposing himself to 16-year-old girl in Florida mall.

Darleen Druyun, a senior contracting official for the Air Force, who pled guilty and was sentenced to nine months in prison for her role in the Boeing tanker lease scandal.

John Korsmo, chairman of the Federal Housing Finance Board, who pled guilty to lying to the Senate and an inspector general about his role in a fundraiser for a friend’s congressional campaign.

P. Trey Sunderland III, Chief of Geriatric Psychiatry at the National Institute of Mental Health, who admitted to a criminal conflict of interest charge for failing to report $300,000 received from Pfizer, Inc., a pharmaceutical company.

Still others have resigned in the face of pending charges or after investigations had been completed. These include:

Carl Truscott, Director of the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Bureau, who resigned after a report by the Justice Department’s Inspector General found he wasted tens of thousands of dollars on luxuries, wasted millions on whimsical management decisions and violated ethics rules by ordering employees to help his nephew with a high school video project.

Joseph Schmitz, the Defense Department’s Inspector General, who resigned amid charges he personally intervened to protect top political appointees.

Susan Ralston, a White House assistant, who resigned amidst revelations she had accepted thousands of dollars in gifts from lobbyist Abramoff without compensating him, counter to White House ethics rules.

Kenneth Tomlinson, Chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and a member of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, who resigned after the release of an inspector general’s report concluding he had broken laws in spending CPB money to hire politically connected consultants to search for “bias” without consulting the board. At BBG, a separate investigation found he was running a “horse racing operation” out of his office, and continuing to hire politically-wired individuals to do “consulting” work for him.

George Deutsch, a NASA press aide, who resigned amid allegations he prevented the agency’s top climate scientist from speaking publicly about global warming.

James Roche, Secretary of the Air Force, who resigned in the wake of the Boeing tanker lease scandal, after it was revealed he had pushed for Boeing to win a $23 billion contract.

Marvin Sambur, the top contracting executive at the Air Force – Darleen Druyun’s boss — who resigned in the wake of the Boeing scandal, though further investigations cleared him of wrongdoing.

Philip Cooney, Chief of Staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, and a former oil industry lawyer with no scientific expertise, who resigned after it was revealed he had watered down reports on global warming.

Thomas Scully, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, who resigned following an investigation by the HHS Inspector General found he had pressured the agency’s actuary to underestimate the full cost of the Medicare reform bill by approximately $100 billion until after Congress passed the bill into law.

Michelle Larson Korsmo, Deputy Chief of Staff at the Department of Labor, who resigned about two weeks before news broke that she and her husband were the targets of a criminal probe.

David Smith, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks at the Interior Department, who resigned after shooting a buffalo and accepting its remains as an illegal gratuity.

Sean Tunis, Chief Medical Officer at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, who left after the State of Maryland suspended his medical license because he faked documentation relating to his medical education.

Julie MacDonald, the Interior Department’s Assistant Secretary of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, who resigned after an Inspector General investigation concluded that she used her position to squelch protection of endangered species.

Janet Rehnquist, the daughter of the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who resigned as Inspector General of the Health and Human Services Department after Congress began investigating her decision to delay an audit of Florida’s pension fund at the request of Gov. Jeb Bush’s office.

Robert E. Coughlin II, Deputy Chief of Staff for the DOJ’s criminal division, who resigned after coming under scrutiny in the Department’s expanding investigation of convicted super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Lester Crawford, who resigned as a commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration and pleaded guilty to charges of “conflict of interest and false reporting of information about stocks he owned in food, beverage and medical device companies he was in charge of regulating.”

Army Secretary Francis Harvey, the Army’s top civilian official, who resigned in the wake of the ongoing controversy about poor outpatient care of injured soldiers at Walter Reid Army Medical Center.

The nominations of a number of other Bush loyalists were withdrawn because of scandal or political opposition. For example:

Harriet Myers, a longtime Bush friend, who the president nominated to be an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court, but later was forced to withdraw because of opposition from the religious right.

Bernard Kerik, nominated on the recommendation of former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to head the Department of Homeland Security, who withdrew his nomination amidst a host of corruption allegations.

Timothy Flanigan, nominated to be Deputy Attorney General, who withdrew his nomination after revelations that he had worked closely with lobbyist Jack Abramoff when he was General Counsel for Corporate and International Law at Tyco, an Abramoff client.

Linda Chavez, nominated to become Secretary of Labor, who withdrew her nomination because of revelations that an illegal immigrant lived in her home and worked for her.

A number of other Bush nominees made it through the Senate confirmation process but remain under scrutiny by Congress because of lack of experience or ideologically-driven views.

One such is Ellen Sauerbrey, now head of the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, the office that coordinates the American response to migration problems caused by war and natural disasters and works with international groups on population and reproductive-health issues.

Sauerbrey’s resume includes no experience in any of these areas. She ran Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign in Maryland, and twice ran for governor of that state.

Another is Julie Myers, head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), whose nomination was criticized by several ICE supervisors and agents who said she was “unqualified” because she never held a law-enforcement management position. Myers leads the largest investigative component of the Department of Homeland Security and the second largest investigative agency in the federal government, with more than 15,000 employees and an annual budget of nearly $5 billion. Her uncle is retired Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, formerly chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

A third is J. Dorrance Smith, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs. Smith, a former ABC News producer and the former media adviser to Coalition Provisional Authority Ambassador L. Paul Bremer, was confirmed by the Senate months after President Bush used a recess appointment to install him in the job. Objections were raised about a column he wrote for the Wall Street Journal in which he suggested that US television networks engaged in “collaboration” with terrorists by airing Arab news reports on al Qaeda.

Many of the Bush Administration’s younger appointees were recruited from right-wing Christian universities, such as Patrick Henry College, whose mission is “to prepare Christian men and women who will lead our nation and shape our culture with timeless biblical values and fidelity to the spirit of the American founding.” Others have come from Liberty University, the Christian liberal arts university founded as Lynchburg Baptist College in 1971 by televangelist Jerry Falwell.

Liberty’s law school is the alma mater of Monica Goodling, the DOJ’s White House liaison officer, who recently resigned rather than testify to Congress about her role in the firing of US attorneys. A long line of Patrick Henry graduates have found their way to internships and permanent positions in the Bush Administration, including some in the office of Karl Rove, the president’s chief political advisor.

Paul Bonicelli, a former Patrick Henry dean, is now the number two official supervising democracy-promotion programs at the US Agency for International Development.

But not all Bush appointees have been happy campers. A number have resigned. For example, John J. DiIulio Jr., the first director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, who quit his post after only seven months on the job, and David Kuo, his deputy, who left saying that “there was minimal senior White House commitment to the faith-based agenda” and that there never really was great concern over what he called “the ‘poor people stuff’.”

DiIulio told Esquire Magazine, “There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus. What you’ve got is everything — and I mean everything — being run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis.” He also decried “a virtual absence as yet of any policy accomplishments that might, to a fair-minded nonpartisan, count as the flesh on the bones of so-called compassionate conservatism.”

The invasion of Iraq also triggered the resignations of a number of officials who disagreed with the Bush Administration’s war policies. Among them were career Foreign Service Officers like John Brown, now a Senior Fellow at the University of Southern California Center on Public Diplomacy, and Mary A. (Ann) Wright, who now writes about US foreign policy and lectures at universities.

But the current controversy related to the forced resignations of nine US attorneys promises to add fuel to the fire caused by what many Administration-watchers describe as the most inept, ideological and politically-driven presidencies in recent US history.

Virtually every American administration has had its share of scandal. The presidencies of Warren G. Harding and Ulysses S. Grant were destroyed by the appointment of corrupt or unqualified officials.

Woodrow Wilson got rid of his attorney general, James McReynolds, by appointing him to the Supreme Court; McReynolds was a reactionary who hated his fellow Justices, Louis Brandeis and Benjamin Cardozo, for being Jewish, and is remembered as one of the worst Justices in it’s history.

Dwight D. Eisenhower had to fire his top aide, Sherman Adams, for accepting a Vicuna coat from a government contractor.

One of John F. Kennedy’s assistant secretaries in the commerce Department was fired for violating the Hatch Act by soliciting campaign contributions from government employees.

Jimmy Carter appointed Bert Lance as head of his Office of Management and Budget, but Lance was forced to resign six months later amid allegations of mismanagement and corruption when Lance was Chairman of the Board of Calhoun National Bank of Calhoun, Georgia.

Lyndon B. Johnson appointed a Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara, who was a serial liar on conditions in Vietnam.

Ronald Reagan had Col. Oliver North, Adm. John Pointdexter and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger in the lead roles of Iran-Contra.
Richard Nixon appointed the arrogant sycophants whose amoral hubris resulted in Watergate.

And Bill Clinton appointed many Arkansas cronies, including Webster Hubbell as his Deputy Attorney General, only to have him assert his Fifth Amendment right not to testify before Congress, but later plead guilty to several felony charges relating to illegal billing in the Whitewater affair.

But critics of the Bush Administration assert that its “appointments deficit” extends wider and deeper than that of any other modern presidency. They contend that, of the 3,000-plus political jobs a president can offer, an exponentially larger proportion of Bush appointees lack the specialized experience they require, are managerially inept and ideologically-driven, have contempt for career civil servants, and regularly sacrifice good governance ethics for personal gain or to curry favor among Bush supporters, especially the Religious Right.

Vacation Videos

Monday, March 17th, 2008

I'll admit it.  I have a problem.  It's hard for me to enjoy a leisurely afternoon on the beach with my kids, without spending a chunk of that "relaxing" time behind some camera or other.  After all, if you don't have pictures of a vacation, did it really happen? 

My kids don't mind being the subjects of my photographs and video.  But they much prefer getting behind the camera themselves.  In the good old days of film, handing your kids a camera could be a costly endeavor.  But with a gigabyte memory card costing less than $50, you can let your kids click at will.  It is a pile of fun to go through the pictures with your kids and pick out the ones that they think are the keepers — it is often surprising to me the things my kids think are the highlights of our vacation.

As much fun as vacation photography is, the thing I really enjoy each summer is the annual Hornik family vacation video competition.  Each summer my kids and I record a bunch of video clips of the summer comings and goings — swimming in the waves, boogie boarding, catching crabs, Grandpa Gerry doing a crossword puzzle.  Once we feel we have enough "quality" footage (a highly subjective decision), the competition begins.  My oldest son, my brother and I all commence editing our respective summer vacation music videos.  The only rule is that we all need to choose from the same video clips.  Otherwise, anything is fair game. 

My son leans towards the more traditional music videos.  He uses songs from Broadway musicals.  His transitions are a little more flashy.  And he tends to enjoy those video clips that make his brothers and sister look the stupidest.  One summer's video featured a number of clips of his brother missing diving catch after diving catch.  Another summer's video involved a whole lot of boogie boarding mishaps by his siblings.  But perhaps the most pointed message came the summer that my son's family video climaxed in a shot of me pacing the beach on my cell phone (I'll admit that I was a bit preoccupied with work that summer).

I have never won the "viewers choice award" in the family video competition.  The decks are stacked — the kids always vote for their Uncle Josh.  But despite my losing streak, we end up with some seriously fun vacation videos.  I only hope I'll be able to get more kid contestants this summer.  Maybe I can split the Uncle Josh vote and have a fighting chance of winning the video competition for once.

Operation Sisyphus

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

Sisyphus is a hero of Greek mythology (1), condemned to roll a large rock up a hill. Upon reaching the top the rock rolls back, and the task has to be repeated - endlessly. The story appears to be one of eternal and pointless labor.

One reader suggests that raising issues of pharmaceutical research misconduct is a pointless Sisyphean task (2) - that this whole field of science is already kaput. It sometimes feels that way (3,4). But the story of Sisyphus is not one of unending misery. Despite the best efforts of the gods, they cannot beat him (1).

Fellow medical bloggers are writing about the way in which the pharmaceutical industry is preventing proper understanding of the science upon which our patients rely (5,6,7,8,9). They write about the way in which industry has subverted those organizations whose task it is to act for our patients to preserve integrity.

But we are attacking the wrong beast.

The beast is not the industry - it is ourselves.

Pharmaceutical companies sell products under the banner of science. But their raison d’être is to make money. Industry has to balance genuine hypothesis testing and transparency against commercial interests and the financial consequences of dishonesty. This is not in itself a criticism - it is a simple fact.

We, as doctors, have created the atmosphere which has allowed lethal system malfunction. We have allowed industry to subvert the rules of science and the free-market. We have watched quietly as governments and academics have colluded with industry to hide information critical to our patients. We have remained silent as our medical schools churn out graduates who have no knowledge of the dilemmas and scandals of medicine. We have allowed our medical journals to become corrupted and timid. We have remained silent as our General Medical Councils have taken action against brave doctors for raising questions of integrity (10). We have said nothing while these old-boys’ clubs have selectively ignored serious concerns brought to their attention (10) - apparently based on the status and race of those criticised (10,11). We have failed to support our colleagues who have raised concerns. We have said nothing.

I have been waiting very patiently. It is now seven months since Procter and Gamble provided previously suppressed data underlying three intended “ghosted” publications to myself, to the University of Sheffield and to other authors in whose names “science” was ghostwritten (12). The discordance between the data and the ghosted interpretations of that data (in our names) will have been obvious even to the most incompetent of statisticians. The unethical nature of the scientific process will also have been obvious to any observer.

Yet the first of these papers that was published in the names of others (J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2003; 18:1051-6) has not yet been retracted. There has been no comment about the attempts by a senior academic to force a colleague to sign journal declarations in the absence of data - even more important given the status of that senior academic as guardian of research governance within a prestigious medical school. There has been no comment about the ethics of denial of access to data, and about the signing of incorrect declarations to journals about access to such data.

The University of Sheffield has admitted that legal threats were made by Procter and Gamble about return of data that the company “owned” and which had been “obtained without their consent”, but have otherwise not commented upon the principles involved

The obvious (and comparatively painless) step of declaring a wrong, and of correcting it, has not yet taken place. There has been no comment at all from those who should comment.

I have waited quietly as the various bodies to whom the matter was referred have done nothing of any relevance.

Once in a while Sisyphus shrugs (13).

How
(John Lennon)

How can I go forward when I don’t know which way I’m facing?
How can I go forward when I don’t know which way to turn?
How can I go forward into something I’m not sure of?
Oh no, oh no

How can I have feeling when I don’t know if it’s a feeling?
How can I feel something if I just don’t know how to feel?
How can I have feelings when my feelings have always been denied?
Oh no, oh no

You know life can be long
And you got to be so strong
And the world is so tough
Sometimes I feel I’ve had enoughThe Myth of Sisyphus by Albert CamusResistance is futile http://www.slate.com/id/2133061/http://www.thejabberwock.org/presshw.htm Health Care Renewal PharmagossipClin Psych Pharma Watch Peter RostThe General Medical Council - a Personal View (Wilmshurst) Wikipedia General Medical CouncilAAAS: http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/per/per46.pdfhttp://www.amazon.co.uk/Atlas-Shrugged-Ayn-Rand
Earlier|Later|Main Page

The Pleasures of the Used Text: Revealing Traces of Consumption

Friday, March 14th, 2008

Janet Borgerson and Jonathan Schroeder

Small, inexpensive, and well-designed, Peter Pauper Press books fit fetchingly into a suitcoat pocket or evening bag. With dependably colorful, decorative dust jackets and entertaining, easily digestible content, few books could be as cheering to give and receive. Perhaps this is why so many found their way into US upper-middle class (and striving) den bookshelves and kitchen cupboards in the 1950s and 1960s. Peter Pauper’s attractively printed cookbooks, poetry volumes and lifestyle hints now recirculate through libraries, discerning used bookstores and as collectibles on eBay. Tantalizing traces of consumption linger in these used books – some apparently stored, tight and unopened, in a bedside table, forlornly filed away in an attic trunk, or boxed and forgotten in a basement bin, while others indicate heavy use, as cherished recipe book, favorite collection of poems, or crucial guide to concocting cocktails. Via an examination of collective collecting memory, this chapter explores the aesthetic dimensions of books – given, received, coveted, and inscribed, then rediscovered and displayed as cultural icons or nostalgic treasures.

In this project, we argue that the popular value of used goods – including books – contradicts the notion that ‘clean’ and ‘new’ determine the borders of consumer desire. We analyze examples from a proliferating personal library in some detail, describing and examining the material pleasures of these used texts, including ‘inscriptions’ such as previous owner’s marginalia – written annotations, highlights and notes left in the pages. Opening these thin volumes for the reader illuminates the ways in which used objects can evoke, and give material form to, the abstract ideas of history and heritage but also, on a more intimate level, prompt nostalgic wonderings around their biographies and past uses. We argue that such wonderings play a central part in the creation of an object’s value, one not embraced in more traditional framings of consumption stemming from a consideration of new goods.
What many consumers value, the efficient market often eliminates. We point out a paradox of online booksellers’ focus on ‘clean’ or ‘tight’ books, free from inscriptions and marks. Economist and philosopher Georges Bataille might recognize marginalia and inscriptions as excess value, excluded by the unreflective operations of the mainstream market, yet contributing to an overall productive environment in a mode that is wasted. Collectors often treasure marked up pages; researchers find these shadowy scribblings provide unobtrusive data about past owners and previous eras. Such qualities provide retro revelations, valued, often, in the wasteland beyond clear financial gains.

The Peter Pauper Press: A Case Study of Collectibility

Peter Pauper Press helped popularize the gift book market by marketing petite, relatively inexpensive and innocuous volumes – perfect solutions for anniversaries, birthdays, or house warming parties. Their 4 1/2 x 7 inch books, with stylized collage, woodcut graphics and craftily coordinated colors emerged in early form from the Beilenson family’s press in 1948. Running the gamut from lauded literature to lascivious limericks, the Mount Vernon publisher produced condensed editions of John Donne, Francis Bacon and Omar Khayyam; volumes of Japanese Haiku, Chinese love lyrics, and Portuguese sonnets; as well as little puzzle books and quippy quotes about love and women. Their ‘Simple’ series – such as Simple Italian Cookery and Simple Spanish Cookery – predated today’s ‘for Dummies’ and ‘for Beginners’ guides by decades. An ‘ethnic’ cookbook series introduced uncertain chefs to intriguing ingredients and dishes of Japanese, Italian, Spanish, Hawaiian and colonial American gastronomy.

Our favorite examples are from the delightful ‘ABC’ series, which includes drink and dining recipes for all occasions. These colorful cookbooks, each in the same tidy size, and featuring similar, pleasing designs, focus on specialized culinary themes, for example, ‘chafing dish cookery’, ‘herb and spice cookery’, ‘ wine cookery’, ‘and ‘microwave cookery’. We are not alone in valuing these minor manuscripts: several recent exhibitions reveal the growing estimation and cultural cachet of Peter Pauper Press -– demonstrating how marginal publications often transform into culturally notable artifacts, due to their provenance, their publication history, or their popularity. We invite the reader to join us as we dust off an expanding archive of little literature, a unique retro window into an aesthetic economy of books.

About Book Collecting

What makes books worth collecting? A hypertext of interests influences acquiring, buying or collecting used books. For example, our hankering for Hawaiiana, as a general genre, prompted our purchase of Peter Pauper Press Simple Hawaiian Cookery. Our fondness for a specific eras’ designs and colors – such as the fashion for combining salmon pink, turquoise blue, and black – provoked us to pick up Festive Salads and Molds. The collecting craze commenced. We began scouring used bookstores coast to coast – from Titcomb’s in Cape Cod to Moe’s in Berkeley by way of John King’s in Detroit. Sometimes, we found a separate Peter Pauper section, but the biggest rush came from spotting a copy amongst aging cookbooks and poetry, flashing like gold flecks in our prospector’s pan. Fortuitously, we found a few among our parents’ books, another in a grandmother’s cabin, and, as we regaled our friends with tales of the hunt, they humored us with used gifts of Peter Pauper Press to complement our enlarging collection. In over ten years collecting Peter Pauper Press, we find that searching for elusive examples, ruminating over what’s worth collecting, bargaining over prices, and displaying precious purchases increase the pleasures of the used text. We love finding a obscure volume at the back of a dimly lighted used bookstore, and continue to compete between ourselves to discover the most desirable example, plucked from the shadows of neglect, filling a previously unrevealed hole in our oeuvre.

Valuing Inscriptions and Marginalia

Unintimidating and intimate in scale, Peter Pauper Press volumes perhaps invited small authorial interventions. Gift books, moreover, often call for personal inscriptions to the recipient. This excess text often adds value to the collected book. Yet a World Wide Web search suggests that ‘clean’ and ‘tight’ copies – with no marks and uncreased or unbroken bindings – bring in bids on eBay and other online selling sites. Vendors appear to believe that a book must be as close to untouched as possible, that any distinguishing feature, whether sudden reader revelations or judgments noted in margins, are unwelcome and devaluing.

However, some book collectors (like us) value ephemeral notations – often anonymous – made in distant places and times, rediscovered and puzzled over years later. Margin marks personalize books, reminding the reader which recipe went well or jogging the memory about what joke worked when. Gift inscriptions mark meaningful moments and relationships. These marginalia help transform the profane object into a sacred keepsake. Of course, an author’s signature enhances a book’s collectibility. Furthermore, when someone famous graces a book with notes, then every detail and comment may be of interest, and if a well known artist marks a text, then every sketch and scribble becomes significant.

Tracing Consumption: Recirculating the Gift

Traces of consumption reveal humanity behind our objects of desire. An unexpected aspect of our research shed light into the intimate nature of buying and selling. Collecting books and used book buying may be influenced by profit making hopes, but here we have turned to the pleasures of the used text, the ephemeral and eclectic, a respect, attachment, and connection to small practices, marginalia, gifts, intimate life experiences, and personalities from the past, drawing unexpected insights from looking at little literature and paying attention to the lessons beyond the text.

The pleasures of used texts invoke cultural norms and class-related social practices – style, taste, and etiquette – packaged and presented to an upwardly mobile market. Peter Pauper Press served as an accessible introduction to a wider world, creating cosmopolitan consumers quoting African proverbs, Blake’s poetry and Chinese love lyrics over chafing dish delights. The Peter Pauper Press output might be termed the ABC of cosmopolitanism – guidebooks to a mobile, articulate, cultured life. These little books made belle-lettres authors, exotic ingredients, and foreign figures available to mainstream US consumers, much as hi-fi record albums brought faraway sounds onto 1950s patios. Thus, Peter Pauper Press’s attractive books contributed small signals of success in the quest for adventurous dining, broader horizons and cultural capital.

Used goods tell consumption stories and consumption stories sell used goods. We have shown how material practices, such as collecting, gift giving, and inscribing, create meaning. Consumption traces alter the text, marking books with sacred, and, sometimes, economic value – as witnessed by the attention that famous figures’ marginalia attracts. Marginalia – banished by booksellers, expunged from electronic databases, and erased by efficient indexing – animates consumption objects, offering nostalgic narratives of everyday lives. This excess – gingerbread recipe notes preserved in The Melting Pot Cookbook, a scholar’s scribbled comments on an influential tome, ancestral names written in the family Bible – defies the assumption that ‘clean’ and ‘new’ determine the borders of consumer desire. These traces of consumption – largely absent from the References emerging electronic marketplace – offer unobtrusive insights into the pleasures of the used text, demonstrating how consumers, collectors and curators imbue books with meaning, how books become part of everyday life, and why they carry so much potential value for families, friends, and fanatical collectors within an aesthetic economy of books.

Images used with permission of Managing Editor Nick Beilenson at Peter Pauper Press. All examples from author’s collection.

Janet Borgerson is Reader in Philosophy and Management and Jonathan Schroeder is Professor of Marketing at the University of Exeter. They are founding members of the Information Society Network.

Further reading:
Borgerson, Janet L. and Jonathan E. Schroeder (2006) “The Pleasures of the Used Text: Revealing Traces of Consumption,

48 Hour Film Project - 2007

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

The 48 Hour Film Project
for Boston 2007 has come to an end and it was pretty awesome. There were
100 teams this year of which 92 finished films and handed them in. I
helped usher again and saw some 83 movies over the course of the last
two weeks. A bunch of them were filmed within a half mile of my apartment
just outside of Davis Square.

This is my fourth year ushering. Over the four years the movies have
gotten better. A large portion of the teams have done it for several
years and you can definitely tell they’ve gotten most of the kinks out
of their filming and post-production. I think the availability of
better filming and production equipment and software helps as well.
Some of the teams were mentioning how they used cameras that stored
data on hard drives directly and this saved them gobs of time that
they would have spent transferring the data from tape to hard drive.

The 48hfp folks have created a new site for hosting movies at
http://www.48.tv, though they don’t have
the Boston 2007 movies up yet (obviously). Some teams are uploading their
movies onto YouTube and other video sites. If you search for “48hfp” or
“48 hour film Boston 2007″ you can see them.

It was a really great year for movies. There’s a Best Of showing at
the Cooliedge Corner Theatre on June 7th. It’s definitely worth going
to if you’ve got the time. There are more details
here under “Best Of”.

Wise words, or how lawyering changes with the Internet

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008

Put this in the file drawer marked “It Ain’t Business as Usual Anymore” right there along with the previous stuff about how silly it was to propose anti-trust exemptions so that media companies can put their content behind walls.

In this case, it’s John Dvorak at Marketwatch speaking truth to power — specifically lawyers armed with “cease and desist” letters. The backstory is the discovery of a 32-digit hexadecimal key that apparently is part of the copy protection in HD-DVD players. It was cracked and, of course, posted on the Internet. It ended up on Digg, which promptly got one of those letters. Digg caved, but then put the post back up. Dvorak picks it up from there — a few selected excerpts, but be sure to read the whole thing:

But the episode reemphasizes the new era in corporate control of trade secrets: It’s harder to keep a secret than ever before, and lawyers are not helping. I think it’s time I doled out some advice for the corporate executives who can’t bring themselves to admit that it is not 1952 anymore. …

When an attorney sends out threatening letters to people these days, especially to bloggers and other Internet mavens, these documents get scanned and published online to be widely distributed. Most of these letters are written to sound intimidating, often with a lot of language that’s mean-spirited. People, sometimes by the millions, read these and get angry not at the lawyer, but at the company that hired the lawyer. This can lead to a public-relations disaster. Once something goes out on the Net, it gets copied and posted elsewhere. Even if the original is taken down, other versions appear immediately. The legal profession has not adjusted to this new phenomenon, and as long as they are being paid by the billable hour, they figure the PR folks (also paid by the billable hour) can fix any problem. …

But if ruining a client’s image and reputation, and often turning it into a laughingstock is done in the name of “protecting,” then perhaps the legal profession should reconsider whether it’s being counterproductive.
The AACS, the folks behind the “advanced access content system” now are scrambling to revoke that particular key and make everyone with a player update the software. Let the games begin.

Do you see any parallels here with the cries of anguish from newspapers and others in journalism? I do. The bottom line is that control may be achievable, but at such a high cost (in money and squandered consumer goodwill) that it’s not worth it. Put the effort into developing content people want, even if you end up narrowcasting. More and more, people seem to have a way of finding what they need and aggregating it.

fMRI of the Stop Signal Task: What computations support “stopping”?

Monday, March 10th, 2008

Right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) is thought by some to implement “inhibition” of motor responses when they must be abruptly stopped (as in the Stop Signal paradigm). It is still unclear how rIFC might actually accomplish this, and even if it does that in the first place. Nonetheless, this paper from the Journal of Neuroscience makes great strides in establishing the neural mechanisms of response inhibition.

Authors Aron & Poldrack argue that rIFC may target a region of the basal ganglia known as subthalamic nucleus (STN). The STN is a special region of basal ganglia in that it is thought to excite the internal/medial globus pallidus as well as the substantia nigra pars reticulata, both of which then inhibit the thalamus. Thus, the end result of rIFG activation may be a general “clamping down” of thalamic output, if the rIFG does indeed target the STN - this is known as the “hyperdirect pathway.”

It is not controversial that STN accomplishes such inhibition both neurally and behaviorally. Aron & Poldrack review evidence showing that STN stimulation improves stop signal reaction time (thought to be a measure of how much time is required for subjects to “cancel” a motor action). Likewise, STN damage decreases stop signal reaction time.

What is controversial, however, is the existence of the “hyperdirect pathway” whereby rIFG directly activates STN and thus inhibits cortical activity. The more commonly accepted mechanism is known as the “indirect pathway,” in which cortical areas activate striatal pathways, which themselves disinhibit STN, by inhibiting the external globus pallidus (you can probably see where it gets its name!).

To identify which of these two possible neural networks are active in motor inhibition, the authors put 18 healthy, right-handed adults into an fMRI scanner, where they were presented with a screen containing either a left- or right-pointing arrow. Each subject was told to press a corresponding left or right key, unless a sound was played after the presentation of the arrow, in which case subjects had to refrain from pressing the button (although this sound was only played on 25% of trials). The delay between the display of the arrow and the onset of the sound was dynamically calibrated to each subject while in the scanner, such that each subject was getting around 50% of the “stop trials” correct and 50% incorrect. The value of this delay is known as the stop signal delay, or SSD. This is then subtracted from the median reaction time on go trials to arrive at the stop signal reaction time, or SSRT.

The classic interpretation of SSRT is that it represents the rate of diffusion of a “stopping process,” whereas the reaction time on normal go trials represents the rate of diffusion of a “go process.” This is known as Logan’s race model. The behavioral results were largely in line with this conceptual model, and showed that SSRT and RT on go trials were uncorrelated, supporting the “race model’s” assumption that processes involved in “stop” and “go” trials are distinct. Secondly, the median reaction time for incorrect stop trials (i.e., where subjects incorrectly made a response) was faster than the median reaction time on correct go trials, which is again consistent with the race model. SSRTs were within the normal range of around 120 ms.

The fMRI results showed that all “stop” trials were associated with activity in right inferior frontal cortex and STN, consistent with the hyperdirect account. However, failed “stop” trials demonstrated strongly decreased motor cortex activity (M1) towards the end of each trial relative to both Go trials and correct “stop” trials. This was interpreted to indicate that inhibition was “triggered at the neural level, even if it was ineffective at the behavioral one.” Conversely, correctly inhibited “stop” trials were associated with increased putamen activity relative to incorrect stop trials, which Aron & Poldrack persuasively argue to reflect higher conflict, resulting from a slower “go” process on those trials.

In support of the “hyperdirect” pathway, activity in rIFC was correlated with activity in STN , and activity in both regions was stronger for subjects with faster SSRTs. Other analyses suggest that while the degree to which rIFC is recruited does not depend on SSD, activity in STN, pSMA and globus pallidus does, such that those regions are more active the longer the SSD (and thus the closer to execution the response is).

There are several complications in interpreting these results. First, the decreased M1 activity on failed stop trials may have to do with the length of those trials as compared to the length of correct Go trials, which showed a very similar but protracted temporal profile. Furthermore, if signal strength reductions are to indicate inhibition, it is strange that “go” trials would show this pattern - because clearly inhibition is neither needed nor performed on correct “go” trials! This suggests that inhibition may not be an accurate term for what is observed in this case.

Secondly, there are at least three reasons that STN, pSMA and globus pallidus might be more active on trials in which the stop signal occurs later relative to trials where it occurs earlier. The possibility endorsed by Aron & Poldrack is that in late-signal trials motoric inhibition must be performed (since the movement may already be initiated), whereas in early-signal trials more “cognitive” inhibition must be performed (since only movement planning will have begun). However, it’s also possible this is an an artifact of the longer “go” process which is necessarily present on these trials, as was argued to be the case for putamen activity. Or it could be that this activity is akin to the “lateralized readiness potential” detected by EEG studies of stop signal, in which there is increasingly negative frontal activity as a stop signal trial wears on. Either way, the conclusion that this reflects greater motoric inhibition is simply premature.

Third, if rIFC actually executes inhibition, it is strange that activity in that region is insensitive to the type of inhibition that would have to be performed. For example, one would expect different patterns of activity in rIFC for trials requiring motoric inhibition relative to those requiring “cognitive inhibition,” and yet this was not observed. Instead, the activity in this region is more compatible with an account where rIFC is actively monitoring task cues/performance and orchestrating subsequent control or selection processes, rather than accomplishing inhibition per se.

This perspective is also compatible with a wide variety of findings on the functional role of rIFC. For example, right inferior frontal activity has been associated with both deviance and novelty detection in an oddball paradigm. Detection of unusual stimuli would be important for a region involved in “task monitoring.” Likewise, rIFC is more activated by negative than positive feedback. Finally, rIFC is also most active during conditions of high WM load, also suggesting a role for that region in selection or monitoring processes, but not necessarily inhibition.

Related Posts:
Noninhibitory Accounts of Negative Priming
Inhibition and rTMS
Backward Inhibition: Evidence and Possible Mechanisms
Inhibition from Excitation: Reconciling Directed Inhibition with Cortical Structure
The Tyranny of Inhibition

Christian Carnival CLXXXV

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

Want this badge?